🔹 1. What should the inspector do FIRST?
A. Stop work
B. Leave site
C. Escalate to purchaser
D. Argue
👉 Answer: C – Escalate
❗ Trap: Many pick “stop work” → but inspector has no authority to stop vendor operations
🔹 2. Minor deviation found
👉 Answer: D – Report
❗ Inspector NEVER approves deviations
🔹 3. Missing ITP at site
👉 Answer: C – Stop and report
❗ No ITP = no controlled inspection
🔹 4. Vendor asks for verbal approval
👉 Answer: C
❗ No verbal approvals—everything must be documented
🔹 5. Two documents conflict (PO vs ITP)
👉 Answer: C – Escalate
❗ Never assume hierarchy in conflict—clarify
🔹 6. Witness point missed
👉 Answer: C
❗ Witness ≠ mandatory stop (that’s hold point)
🔹 7. Hold point passed without inspector
👉 Answer: C – Escalate
❗ Don’t auto-reject—follow process
🔹 8. Unsafe condition observed
👉 Answer: C
❗ Safety overrides everything
🔹 9. Inspector unsure about spec requirement
👉 Answer: C
❗ Never rely on vendor interpretation
🔹 10. Vendor offers gift
👉 Answer: B
❗ Ethics = zero tolerance
🔹 11. NDT report shows borderline result
👉 Answer: C
❗ Inspector doesn’t make final engineering judgment
🔹 12. Drawing revision mismatch
👉 Answer: C
❗ Revision control is critical
🔹 13. Equipment passes test but docs incomplete
👉 Answer: C
❗ Documentation = part of compliance
🔹 14. Vendor pressures inspector to sign
👉 Answer: C
❗ No pressure-based decisions
🔹 15. Non-critical defect found
👉 Answer: C
❗ Even minor issues must be recorded
🔹 16. Calibration certificate expired
👉 Answer: C
❗ Uncalibrated tools = invalid inspection
🔹 17. Vendor procedure differs from spec
👉 Answer: C
❗ Always resolve conflict formally
🔹 18. Inspector arrives late for hold point
👉 Answer: C
❗ Same logic: no unilateral decisions
🔹 19. Test results acceptable but method incorrect
👉 Answer: C
❗ Process matters as much as result
🔹 20. Vendor says “this is standard practice”
👉 Answer: C
❗ Never rely on vendor claims
Not a member yet? Register now
Are you a member? Login now